Resolved Question: Criticisms of Ron Paul's foreign policy positions that aren't completely baseless, redundant or Straw man?

3 February 2012, 2:34 am

I'm just curious. Do they exist? That falls in the straw man category. Refuted. @ Schmuck: You're representing your name very well. Iran's enemy (Israel) has more nukes than the entire region combined. @ Schmuck: You're representing your name very well. Iran's enemy (Israel) has more nukes than the entire region combined. Thanks GFTP. That is a rational criticism. It's not baseless or anything of that nature. The rest of you seem to not know what you're talking about. @ Hubbly Bubbly: I do have some criticisms of Pual's positions. That's hardly my style, and your answer is baseless, as expected.... Read More »

More Topics from "Answers"

• Resolved Question: Why do Conservatives assume that their ultra-nationalist right wing agenda equals "the will of the people"?
• Resolved Question: Republicans, how many of you are pro-war regardless of circumstances yet,?
• Resolved Question: USA Presidential elections?
• Resolved Question: Isn't interesting how Ron Paul is called the "father of the Tea Party", yet most Teabaggers don't support him?
• Resolved Question: Why is Romney pushing for X-tra expensive F-35 jet when McCain and Secretary of Defense Gates are against it?
• Resolved Question: Did you have to show photo ID to vote for George Washington or Abraham Lincoln?
• Resolved Question: Does it really matter who wins the Repub. Election?
• Resolved Question: I apologize for posting a link that didn't work. Here, can you try this one?
• Resolved Question: Does any active member of Congress not use Earmarks?